2 min read

Reviewed by: Johansson M, PsyD

Ruth Bader Ginsburg – Supreme Court Justice : INTP or ENFP or XXXX?

Loading spinner

Photos



Compare

Compare MBTI Types
Type 1:
Type 2:
👉🏻

Know your Type in Four simple questions

Question 1 of 4 – What can you relate to the most?
Are involved in what is happening outside and around them
Are immersed in own world of thoughts and feelings
Question 2 of 4 – What can you relate to the most?
Wonder mostly about the past or the future
See everyone and sense everything

Question 3 of 4 – What can you relate to the most?

You connect deeply with others, sharing their joys and sorrows as your own. You share your feelings freely, fostering connection.


You approach the world with logic and reason, seeking clarity and understanding. You focus on facts and enjoy dissecting puzzles and historical events.

Question 4 of 4 – What can you relate to the most?
Plan ahead but act impulsively following the situation
Plan a schedule ahead and tend to follow it

Summary


MBTI description and physical appearance

Enneagram Type:

Under renovation.

Related Celebrities: Dual Partners

Likely conflicting partners

Name Ruth Bader Ginsburg
Profession Supreme Court Justice
Date of Birth 1933-03-15
Place of Birth Brooklyn, NY
Age
Death Date
Birth Sign Pisces

About Ruth Bader Ginsburg

Associate justice of the Supreme Court nominated by Bill Clinton in 1993. She is well-known for constant advocation of gender equality.

Ruth Bader Ginsburg

She worked with the ACLU to advance the treatment of women after she graduated from Columbia Law School.

Knowledge Base

She continued her work for women s equality on the Supreme Court where she ruled that the Virginia Military Institute, a state-funded school, could not refuse entry to women.

She had an older sister who passed away as a child. She has two children with husband Martin D. Ginsburg, a noted tax expert.

She ended her dissenting opinion in the 2000 case deciding whether George W. Bush or Al Gore won the election with “I dissent,” pointedly leaving out the traditional “respectfully.”

Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *